In a recent study published in the journal “BIO Web of Conferences,” Suryadi Suryadi from the Faculty of Social and Political Science at Maritim Raja Ali Haji University sheds light on the complex relationship between Indonesia’s maritime boundaries and the economic well-being of its fishermen. With a staggering population of around 1.5 million fishermen, Indonesia’s maritime landscape is not just a source of livelihood but a crucial element of national security and economic stability.
The research delves into how maritime boundary arrangements with neighboring countries can significantly impact the fishing industry. According to Suryadi, “The impact of conflict is not widespread for fishermen at sea. If not maximized, the economy will be disrupted, ultimately affecting society’s welfare.” This statement underscores the delicate balance that must be maintained to ensure that fishermen can operate without the looming threat of territorial disputes.
At the heart of the matter is the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which lays out the framework for establishing territorial waters and Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs). For Indonesia, a nation with an extensive coastline of approximately 95,181 kilometers and numerous small islands, navigating these regulations is vital. The study emphasizes that without well-defined boundaries, fishermen face not only economic uncertainty but also potential conflicts that could jeopardize their livelihoods.
The challenges posed by unclear maritime boundaries are not just theoretical; they have real-world implications for the fishing community. Fishermen often rely on specific areas for their catch, and disputes over these zones can lead to reduced access to resources, higher operational costs, and ultimately, a decline in income. This situation can ripple through local economies, affecting everything from fish markets to supply chains.
However, the study also points to opportunities for improvement. By implementing effective policies and fostering international cooperation, the Indonesian government can help mitigate risks for fishermen. This could involve clearer agreements with neighboring countries and enhanced support for local fishermen to navigate these complex waters.
Suryadi’s research serves as a critical reminder for maritime professionals about the interconnectedness of policy, security, and economic health in the fishing sector. As he notes, “The policy taken by the government must be implemented for the safety and welfare of Indonesian fishermen.”
For those in the maritime industry, this study highlights the importance of proactive engagement with both policymakers and international partners to safeguard the interests of Indonesia’s fishermen while also exploring avenues for sustainable growth. The findings are a call to action for stakeholders to ensure that the economic potential of Indonesia’s vast maritime resources is realized without compromising the welfare of its fishing communities.
