In a groundbreaking study published in ‘Applied Sciences,’ José M. Pérez-Canosa from the University of A Coruña has unveiled a new methodology aimed at optimizing the securing arrangements of non-standardized cargo on ships. As the maritime industry grapples with the complexities of transporting increasingly larger and heavier cargo, this research comes at a crucial time.
General cargo ships, which account for over 13% of the global fleet, continue to be essential despite the rise of containerization. These vessels are often tasked with carrying specialized items that simply don’t fit into standard containers. This has led to a heightened need for effective stowage and securing plans, particularly as heavy industry and renewable sectors demand more multipurpose vessels. Pérez-Canosa notes, “The securing arrangement should be as economical as possible while safe standards are maintained.”
The study emphasizes that human error is a significant factor in maritime accidents, with a staggering 80.7% of incidents from 2014 to 2022 attributed to human elements. This highlights the necessity for improved methodologies in stowage planning. Pérez-Canosa’s approach involves the use of novel mathematical models and 3D maps, making it easier for shipping professionals to visualize and implement optimal securing arrangements. The research leverages the Code of Safe Practice for Cargo Stowage and Securing (CSS Code) set forth by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a standard that many shipping companies already reference.
One of the standout features of this new methodology is its ability to predict the best securing arrangements using the minimum number of lashing devices while ensuring safety. This is a game-changer for the shipping industry, as it could lead to reduced operational costs and enhanced cargo safety. The models developed can help shipping companies avoid costly accidents and cargo claims, which are often the result of poor stowage practices.
Pérez-Canosa explains, “Our modeling process was aimed at guaranteeing safety with minimal economic costs of sea transport.” This dual focus on safety and cost-effectiveness presents a significant opportunity for maritime companies to streamline their operations. By adopting these new methodologies, they can enhance their service offerings while potentially lowering insurance premiums through improved safety records.
As the industry looks to the future, the potential for integrating artificial intelligence into these processes could further revolutionize cargo stowage and securing. The research sets the stage for future investigations that could refine these models even further, providing a robust framework for maritime professionals to follow.
For those in the shipping sector, this research not only highlights the importance of innovative securing arrangements but also underscores the need for continuous improvement in practices that directly impact safety and costs. As Pérez-Canosa’s findings circulate through the industry, we may soon see a shift in how non-standardized cargo is handled, leading to safer seas and more efficient shipping practices.
