Dalian Researchers Revolutionize Methanol-Powered Liner Shipping

In a significant stride towards greening the maritime industry, researchers from Dalian Maritime University have developed a novel approach to optimize container liner shipping systems for methanol-powered vessels. Led by Zhaokun Li from the School of Maritime Economics and Management, the study addresses the complexities introduced by the shift from heavy fuel oil (HFO) to methanol, offering valuable insights for policymakers and shipping companies alike.

The global push for decarbonization has put the shipping industry under the microscope, with stringent emission reduction targets looming. China, for instance, aims to achieve peak carbon emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060, while the European Union is set to incorporate shipping into its emissions trading system starting in 2024. Against this backdrop, methanol has emerged as a frontrunner in the race for green fuels, with a notable increase in orders for methanol-powered liners.

However, methanol’s lower energy density presents unique operational challenges. As Li explains, “Methanol-powered liners consume fuel at a rate approximately twice that of HFO-powered liners.” This increased fuel consumption necessitates more frequent bunkering and a more precise sailing speed management strategy, adding layers of complexity to the traditional liner shipping system design (LSSD).

To tackle these challenges, Li and his team proposed a bi-level programming model that integrates liner speed management and bunker fuel management strategies with traditional network design decisions. The upper-level model optimizes the number of liners deployed and the shipping network structure, while the lower-level model coordinates decisions associated with liner sailing speed, bunker fuel management, and slot allocation.

The team also developed an adaptive piecewise linearization approach combined with a genetic algorithm to efficiently solve large-scale instances of the model. This innovative approach allows for a more comprehensive balance of various decisions in LSSDs, providing a robust tool for liner companies navigating the green fuel transition.

So, what does this mean for the maritime industry? Well, for starters, it offers a roadmap for optimizing operations in the face of fuel transition. By considering factors like fuel types and prices, the model can help liner companies make informed decisions about their shipping networks and operational strategies. For instance, the study found that a 25% decrease in green methanol prices could lead to network expansion and increased competitiveness.

Moreover, the findings have significant implications for policymakers. The study suggests that policy tools can directly influence technological choices, with the current carbon tax mechanism successfully making green fuels and traditional fuels equally competitive. However, the double cost pressure of higher fuel costs and carbon taxes might prompt the industry to transition directly from traditional fuels to green fuels, bypassing gray methanol as a transitional stage.

For ports, the shift in bunker fuel management strategies presents both challenges and opportunities. As liners adopt more distributed bunkering strategies, ports may need to invest in infrastructure to support green fuel bunkering capabilities. This could open up new revenue streams and solidify their position in the evolving maritime landscape.

The research, published in the Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, is a significant step forward in the quest for sustainable shipping. As Li puts it, “Our paper offers valuable insights for policymakers in designing customized emission reduction policies to support the green fuel transition in the maritime industry.” And with the maritime industry under increasing pressure to decarbonize, these insights are more valuable than ever. So, buckle up, maritime professionals – the future of shipping is green, and it’s just around the corner.

Scroll to Top