In the quest for sustainable shipping, a novel approach is making waves. Living Labs (LLs), collaborative spaces where stakeholders co-create and test innovative solutions, are emerging as a powerful tool in the maritime industry. A recent study, published in the journal ‘Multidisciplinary Adaptive Climate Insights’ (translated from Greek as ‘Πολυεπιστημονικές Προσαρμοστικές Ειδήσεις Κλιματικής Αλλαγής’), sheds light on their potential, with lead author Anna Maria Kotrikla from the University of the Aegean’s Department of Shipping, Trade and Transport in Chios, Greece, at the helm.
Kotrikla and her team delved into eight specific cases of LLs in shipping, focusing on industry segments, stakeholders, and the issues they address. Their findings reveal that LLs are primarily concentrated in the Global North and have been established mostly post-2018. These labs are tackling a range of challenges, from digitalization and supply chain optimization to energy efficiency, decarbonization, and waste management.
The study highlights that LLs align well with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs), particularly SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals). “The UN SDGs can serve as a framework for evaluating shipping innovations across environmental, social, and economic dimensions,” Kotrikla explains.
For maritime professionals, the implications are significant. LLs offer a structured approach to innovation, bringing together key stakeholders—government, industry, and academia—in a collaborative environment. Kotrikla suggests that incorporating civil society could further enhance these efforts, following the Quadruple Helix model.
The commercial impacts are substantial. By fostering innovation, LLs can drive efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance competitiveness. They provide a platform for testing and validating new technologies and processes, reducing the risk of investment in unproven solutions. Moreover, by aligning with the UN SDGs, maritime companies can enhance their sustainability credentials, appealing to environmentally conscious consumers and investors.
However, the study also points out gaps in the literature regarding the actual impact assessment of shipping LLs. Kotrikla emphasizes the need for future research to incorporate in-depth case studies and interviews for a more realistic understanding. This could pave the way for more effective and efficient LL processes, benefiting the entire maritime sector.
In conclusion, Living Labs represent a promising avenue for advancing sustainable shipping. By bringing together diverse stakeholders and fostering innovation, they can help the maritime industry navigate the complex challenges of the 21st century. As Kotrikla puts it, “Efficient LL processes, once validated, can be embraced by the shipping industry, contributing to its sustainability.” For maritime professionals, engaging with these labs could open up new opportunities and drive commercial success in an increasingly competitive and environmentally conscious market.