A recent study has shone a spotlight on the English literacy skills of graduates from the Maritime Institute Jakarta, known locally as STIP Jakarta. Conducted by Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak, the research dives deep into the proficiency levels of deck officers, engine officers, and other shipping professionals, revealing some eye-opening insights that could have significant implications for the maritime sector.
The study involved qualitative interviews with 70 alumni, exploring not just their language skills but also the quality of instruction they received, their exposure to English, and their personal motivation to learn the language. The findings suggest that while some graduates are navigating the waters of English communication with ease, others are struggling to keep their heads above water. This disparity could spell trouble when it comes to effective communication, compliance with international regulations, and even career advancement.
One of the core focuses of the research was to see how well STIP Jakarta’s curriculum aligns with the International Maritime Organisation’s Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping (STCW). The study found that while the curriculum does cover essential communication skills and technical terminology, there are still gaps that need addressing. “The findings reveal varied proficiency levels across skills, with implications for effective communication, compliance with regulations, and career advancement in the maritime industry,” Simanjuntak noted.
For maritime professionals, these gaps in English literacy could lead to serious commercial repercussions. In an industry where safety and professionalism are paramount, the ability to communicate effectively is not just a nice-to-have; it’s a necessity. Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings, which can escalate into dangerous situations at sea. Furthermore, as the global maritime landscape continues to evolve, companies might find themselves at a competitive disadvantage if their crew members lack the necessary language skills.
The study emphasizes the need for targeted interventions to bridge these proficiency gaps. Simanjuntak advocates for collaborative efforts among maritime institutions to enhance English literacy education. This could involve revising curricula, offering additional language training, or even creating partnerships with organizations that specialize in language education. Such initiatives could not only improve safety but also open up new opportunities for graduates, allowing them to compete more effectively in the global job market.
The implications of this research extend beyond individual careers; they touch on the very fabric of the maritime industry as a whole. By prioritizing English literacy, maritime institutions can help foster a safer, more professional environment that aligns with international standards. This is crucial for the industry’s growth and sustainability.
As the maritime sector continues to navigate the complexities of globalization, studies like this one, published in the Journal of Indonesian Educational Research (JPPI), serve as a timely reminder of the importance of language skills in ensuring both safety and success on the high seas.
